feat: Document multi-arch builds - #269
Open
danielvallance wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
danielvallance
temporarily deployed
to
pull-requests
August 27, 2026 11:52 — with 
GitHub Actions
Inactive
GitHub Actions
Inactive
danielvallance
requested review from
jedevc
and
a balanced review from Copilot
August 27, 2026 11:53
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Documents multi-architecture builds for x86_64, arm64, and ROM images.
Changes:
- Adds architecture selection guidance.
- Documents multi-architecture ROM builds.
- Updates FAQ and tutorials for ARM support.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 5 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
pages/tutorials/rootfs-volumes-roms.mdx |
Adds ROM target guidance. |
pages/tutorials/docker-to-ukc.mdx |
Documents ARM build targets. |
pages/platform/images.mdx |
Adds architecture configuration details. |
pages/features/roms.mdx |
Adds architecture-aware ROM examples. |
pages/faq.mdx |
Updates supported architecture information. |
Suppressed comments (1)
pages/platform/images.mdx:138
- These rows cover cases where only one selector is supplied, but the result says an architecture must be listed in both selectors. That incorrectly implies that
--arch arm64withouttargetsselects nothing, contradicting the preceding explanation and the ROM guidance. Describe each selector independently and mention intersection only when both are present.
| `runtime` with `targets` or `--arch` | Only the architectures listed in both `targets` and `--arch`, which must be ones the runtime provides. |
| [`roms`](/features/roms) with no `runtime` | Only the architectures listed in both `targets` and `--arch`, and the build fails if neither are provided. |
💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.
|
|
||
| targets: | ||
| - kraftcloud/x86_64 | ||
| - kraftcloud/arm64 |
danielvallance
force-pushed
the
danielvallance/multi_arch_builds
branch
from
August 27, 2026 12:02
2bdea67 to
44c7e09
Compare
danielvallance
temporarily deployed
to
pull-requests
August 27, 2026 12:02 — with
GitHub Actions
Inactive
GitHub Actions
Inactive
nurof3n
requested changes
Aug 28, 2026
danielvallance
force-pushed
the
danielvallance/multi_arch_builds
branch
from
August 28, 2026 17:58
44c7e09 to
20a3c78
Compare
danielvallance
had a problem deploying
to
pull-requests
August 28, 2026 17:59 — with
GitHub Actions
Failure
GitHub Actions
Failure
| | [`roms`](/features/roms) with no `runtime` | Only the architectures listed in both `targets` and `--arch`, and the build fails if neither are provided. | | ||
|
|
||
| :::caution | ||
| Multi-platform builds need a correctly configured BuildKit builder on the host. Learn more [here](https://docs.docker.com/build/building/multi-platform/) |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🚫 [vale] reported by reviewdog 🐶
[Unikraft.NoSentenceBreaks] Only use one sentence per line.
danielvallance
force-pushed
the
danielvallance/multi_arch_builds
branch
from
August 28, 2026 18:04
20a3c78 to
9184561
Compare
danielvallance
had a problem deploying
to
pull-requests
August 28, 2026 18:04 — with
GitHub Actions
Failure
GitHub Actions
Failure
danielvallance
had a problem deploying
to
pull-requests
August 28, 2026 18:21 — with
GitHub Actions
Failure
GitHub Actions
Failure
nurof3n
requested changes
Aug 28, 2026
danielvallance
force-pushed
the
danielvallance/multi_arch_builds
branch
from
August 28, 2026 18:45
9184561 to
59b50d1
Compare
danielvallance
had a problem deploying
to
pull-requests
August 28, 2026 18:45 — with
GitHub Actions
Failure
GitHub Actions
Failure
Closes: FIELD-787 Signed-off-by: Daniel Vallance <daniel@unikraft.com>
danielvallance
force-pushed
the
danielvallance/multi_arch_builds
branch
from
August 28, 2026 19:22
59b50d1 to
7507ed6
Compare
danielvallance
had a problem deploying
to
pull-requests
August 28, 2026 19:22 — with
GitHub Actions
Failure
GitHub Actions
Failure
nurof3n
approved these changes
Aug 28, 2026
nurof3n
left a comment
nurof3n
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM!
Reviewed-by: Alex-Andrei Cioc andrei.cioc@unikraft.io
Approved-by: Alex-Andrei Cioc andrei.cioc@unikraft.io
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes: FIELD-787