Support features for PGP - #247
Open
Henry1601 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Collaborator
|
Hi! Thanks for your contribution to the CSTC. We'll look into your proposed changes and will update you soon. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi, recently I've encountered cases where the application implements traffic encryption and signing using Open PGP. So I developed these features for CSTC for better support. It'd be great if you could integrate these new features!
What changes I made:
de.usd.cstchef.operations.encryption: new components that support PGP encryption and decryption with provided keys in PEM format.de.usd.cstchef.operations.signature: new component that supports PGP signing with a provided private key in PEM formatbcprov-jdk18onof bouncycastle topom.xml.Please feel free to mention me if any issues arise or any further discussion is needed.