Make OpenCode image builds production-ready - #2
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
Root causes fixed
The initial GitHub workflow used the Gitea-only
gitea.refexpression, so GitHub rejected the workflow definition. The repository YAML also contained trailing blank lines rejected by its ownyamllintpolicy. Additional build-path issues included an unused.env, floating runtime installs, and PHP images claiming browser support without provisioning Playwright.Validation
Remaining deployment gate
The real six-variant Incus build requires a trusted self-hosted Ubuntu runner with
/dev/kvm, an Incus storage pool, at least 220 GiB free, and the configured runner label. The PR remains draft until that hardware build is run and one exported package is imported on a clean Incus host.