BE-841: Remove the `start` script from `hash-graph-atlas` and filter the bench workflow's start tasks by claude[bot] · Pull Request #9633 · hashintel/hash

claude · 2026-09-09T16:29:13Z

Requested by Tim Diekmann · Slack thread

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

Before: The hash-graph-benches job fails on every run since #9306 made @apps/hash-graph depend on @rust/hash-graph-atlas. The bench workflow runs turbo run start without a filter, so it also runs the atlas package's start script. That script points at the standalone hash-graph-atlas binary, which requires the cli feature, so cargo refuses to build it, the graph server start is aborted, and the healthcheck times out.

After: The atlas package has no start script, and the bench workflow starts only @apps/hash-graph. The standalone atlas binary only runs one-off operator jobs (fit, report, dump); serving lives in the hash-graph binary, so there is no atlas service to start.

🔗 Related links

🚫 Blocked by

Nothing

🔍 What does this change?

Removes the start script from @rust/hash-graph-atlas and drops the matching entry from its generated docs/task-dependencies.json.
Adds --filter @apps/hash-graph to the turbo run start and turbo run start:healthcheck calls in both "Start background tasks" steps of bench.yml.

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

This PR:

does not modify any publishable blocks or libraries, or modifications do not need publishing

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

The changes in this PR:

are internal and do not require a docs change

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

The changes in this PR:

affected the execution graph, and the turbo.json's have been updated to reflect this
- The start task is removed from the atlas package. No turbo.json references it, so only the generated task-dependencies.json changes.

⚠️ Known issues

None.

🐾 Next steps

Close #9616, which adds --features cli to the start script instead of removing it.

🛡 What tests cover this?

The hash-graph-benches job on this PR. Bench-CI is non-blocking, so check its "Start background tasks" step by hand.
The task-dependencies.json lint check in lint.yml verifies the regenerated file matches. The file was edited by hand to match what the generator produces (the sandbox cannot build hash-repo-chores), so this check confirms it.

❓ How to test this?

Open the hash-graph-benches job on this PR.
Confirm the "Start background tasks" step no longer logs target hash-graph-atlasin packagehash-graph-atlasrequires the features:cli``.
Confirm the healthcheck passes and the benches run.

📹 Demo

Not applicable.

… workflow's start tasks

vercel · 2026-09-09T16:29:21Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated
hash	Ready	Preview	Sep 9, 2026 4:47pm UTC
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview	Sep 9, 2026 4:47pm UTC
petrinaut	Ready	Preview	Sep 9, 2026 4:47pm UTC
petrinaut-docs	Ready	Preview	Sep 9, 2026 4:47pm UTC

codspeed-hq · 2026-09-09T16:38:07Z

Merging this PR will not alter performance

⚠️

6 benchmarks measured no execution time

Nothing ran under measurement, usually because the compiler removed the code under test. These results are not comparable, so they count as unchanged.

Preventing compiler optimizations

✅ 98 untouched benchmarks

Performance Changes

	Benchmark	`BASE`	`HEAD`	Efficiency
⚠️	`as_constant`	< 1 ns	< 1 ns	N/A
⚠️	`constant_equal`	< 1 ns	< 1 ns	N/A
⚠️	`constant_not_equal`	< 1 ns	< 1 ns	N/A
⚠️	`access`	< 1 ns	< 1 ns	N/A
⚠️	`runtime_equal`	< 1 ns	< 1 ns	N/A
⚠️	`runtime_not_equal`	< 1 ns	< 1 ns	N/A

_{Comparing claude/be-841-remove-atlas-start-script (dc5afc2) with main (94dff8e)¹}

No successful run was found on main (db4f62c) during the generation of this report, so 94dff8e was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

cursor · 2026-09-09T17:13:51Z

PR Summary

Low Risk
CI and package script changes only; no runtime application logic or auth/data paths are modified.

Overview
Fixes failing hash-graph-benches CI by stopping Turbo from starting the standalone @rust/hash-graph-atlas service during integration bench runs.

The atlas package no longer defines a start script (and its generated task-dependencies.json drops the start task), since serving belongs in @apps/hash-graph and atlas is only for one-off operator binaries. In .github/workflows/bench.yml, both “Start background tasks” steps now run turbo run start and start:healthcheck with --filter @apps/hash-graph, so only the graph app is brought up for base/head bench comparisons.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit dc5afc2. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

github-actions · 2026-09-09T17:47:51Z

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$27.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 236 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.574 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.054 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1002	$$13.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 117 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.771 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$44.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 467 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$14.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 124 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.684 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1527	$$24.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 201 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.450 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$29.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 260 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.590 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.652 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$14.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 161 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.148 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.223 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.05 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.186 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 52	$$3.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.371 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.32 \mathrm{ms} \pm 45.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.417 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.64 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 108	$$4.24 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.706 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.64 \mathrm{ms} \pm 40.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.536 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 34.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.274 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.74 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.409 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.70 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.245 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 2	$$2.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.991 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$3.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.079 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.367 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$3.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.089 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.182 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.115 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.710 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.57 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.270 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.796 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 27	$$3.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.709 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.57 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.11 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.501 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.48 \mathrm{ms} \pm 34.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.48 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$32.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 184 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.640 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$72.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 567 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.424 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$37.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 314 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$40.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 343 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.83 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$43.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 309 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.336 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$33.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 203 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.070 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$422 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.41 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.593 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$93.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 545 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.821 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$79.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 404 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.308 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$276 \mathrm{ms} \pm 916 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.902 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.640 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$10.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.641 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$10.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.239 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$10.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 55.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.599 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$10.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 75.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.555 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$10.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 64.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.073 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.56 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 86.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.48 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 68.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.730 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1`	$$11.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.716 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1`	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 75.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.068 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1`	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 85.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1`	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 71.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.550 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2`	$$11.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 77.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.785 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1`	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.185 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1`	$$11.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 87.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1`	$$11.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 98.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.782 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1`	$$11.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 76.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.384 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: `bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba`	$$8.22 \mathrm{ms} \pm 52.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.50 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$58.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 463 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.79 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$111 \mathrm{ms} \pm 614 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.12 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$63.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 403 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.44 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$72.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 463 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.68 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$82.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 611 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.59 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$88.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 549 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.63 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$46.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 334 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.56 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$74.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 461 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$52.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 464 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$61.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 477 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.73 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$62.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 443 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.476 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$63.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 446 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.65 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$118 \mathrm{ms} \pm 658 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$128 \mathrm{ms} \pm 795 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.19 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$23.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 194 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.156 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$514 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.73 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-1.432 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

Remove the start script from the atlas package and filter the bench…

dc5afc2

… workflow's start tasks

github-actions Bot added area/infra Relates to version control, CI, CD or IaC (area) area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) type/eng > backend Owned by the @backend team labels Sep 9, 2026

claude Bot assigned TimDiekmann Sep 9, 2026

claude Bot mentioned this pull request Sep 9, 2026

BE-838: Restore Atlas package startup after CLI gating #9616

Closed

4 tasks

claude Bot temporarily deployed to pull-request September 9, 2026 16:30 Inactive

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens September 9, 2026 16:31 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut-docs September 9, 2026 16:32 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut September 9, 2026 16:33 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash September 9, 2026 16:47 View deployment

claude Bot marked this pull request as ready for review September 9, 2026 17:13

claude Bot requested a review from a team as a code owner September 9, 2026 17:13

claude Bot requested a review from TimDiekmann September 9, 2026 17:13

TimDiekmann enabled auto-merge September 9, 2026 17:40

TimDiekmann approved these changes Sep 9, 2026

View reviewed changes

TimDiekmann added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 9, 2026

Merged via the queue into main with commit 116ce0f Sep 9, 2026
231 checks passed

TimDiekmann deleted the claude/be-841-remove-atlas-start-script branch September 9, 2026 18:05

Navigation Menu

Uh oh!

BE-841: Remove the `start` script from `hash-graph-atlas` and filter the bench workflow's start tasks - #9633

BE-841: Remove the `start` script from `hash-graph-atlas` and filter the bench workflow's start tasks#9633
TimDiekmann merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/be-841-remove-atlas-start-script

claude Bot commented Sep 9, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented Sep 9, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq Bot commented Sep 9, 2026

Uh oh!

cursor Bot commented Sep 9, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Sep 9, 2026

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Uh oh!

Conversation

claude Bot commented Sep 9, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

🔗 Related links

🚫 Blocked by

🔍 What does this change?

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

⚠️ Known issues

🐾 Next steps

🛡 What tests cover this?

❓ How to test this?

📹 Demo

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented Sep 9, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq Bot commented Sep 9, 2026

Merging this PR will not alter performance

Performance Changes

Footnotes

Uh oh!

cursor Bot commented Sep 9, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Summary

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Sep 9, 2026

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

claude Bot commented Sep 9, 2026 •

edited

Loading

vercel Bot commented Sep 9, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cursor Bot commented Sep 9, 2026 •

edited

Loading