feat(lastcode): add Codex thread inspection - #54
Conversation
|
@codex review |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: b3436cc036
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
b3436cc to
3e4612f
Compare
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 3e4612fc1c
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 901b0783c2
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 6732d11255
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: b9a533b76c
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: a0e46ed769
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: d9bd9d0d33
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 457cfcaa66
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 86e501b743
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 6648627a8d
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 7dc4199d6d
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 9e6169873e
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Nice work! Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
## Problem Codex can infer LastCode session identity by probing environment variables and SQLite, but there is no supported, bounded way to identify, list, or inspect threads—especially when composing the same operation over SSH. ## Solution - add `t3 thread current|list|read` with stable, bounded JSON output; - materialize a home-pinned `lastcode-thread` wrapper and expose it only to Codex processes on supported POSIX hosts; - inject authoritative LastCode thread/home identity and preserve Codex's provider-native thread identity in the session projection; - use least-privilege authenticated live reads with a bounded offline projection fallback; - document explicit local-first/SSH composition without adding host discovery, MCP, or a broker. This PR is slice 1 of umbrella PR #52. It intentionally contains no thread messaging or waiting behavior. ## Validation - five bounded Luna-high review rounds; final correctness, KISS, and best-practices results are clean; - 231 focused tests passed; - focused lint and server/contracts typechecks passed; - repository pre-push quick CI passed: formatting, workspace typechecks, and all workspace tests. Implemented with GPT-5.6 Sol and reviewed with GPT-5.6 Luna in the Codex harness.
## Problem Codex can infer LastCode session identity by probing environment variables and SQLite, but there is no supported, bounded way to identify, list, or inspect threads—especially when composing the same operation over SSH. ## Solution - add `t3 thread current|list|read` with stable, bounded JSON output; - materialize a home-pinned `lastcode-thread` wrapper and expose it only to Codex processes on supported POSIX hosts; - inject authoritative LastCode thread/home identity and preserve Codex's provider-native thread identity in the session projection; - use least-privilege authenticated live reads with a bounded offline projection fallback; - document explicit local-first/SSH composition without adding host discovery, MCP, or a broker. This PR is slice 1 of umbrella PR #52. It intentionally contains no thread messaging or waiting behavior. ## Validation - five bounded Luna-high review rounds; final correctness, KISS, and best-practices results are clean; - 231 focused tests passed; - focused lint and server/contracts typechecks passed; - repository pre-push quick CI passed: formatting, workspace typechecks, and all workspace tests. Implemented with GPT-5.6 Sol and reviewed with GPT-5.6 Luna in the Codex harness.
1 participant
Problem
Codex can infer LastCode session identity by probing environment variables and SQLite, but there is no supported, bounded way to identify, list, or inspect threads—especially when composing the same operation over SSH.
Solution
t3 thread current|list|readwith stable, bounded JSON output;lastcode-threadwrapper and expose it only to Codex processes on supported POSIX hosts;This PR is slice 1 of umbrella PR #52. It intentionally contains no thread messaging or waiting behavior.
Validation
Implemented with GPT-5.6 Sol and reviewed with GPT-5.6 Luna in the Codex harness.